tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279669963757550971.post4744203729021426608..comments2023-07-29T09:45:13.642+01:00Comments on Bootae's Bloody Blog: Mythic comment on players concerns with 1.3.2Bootaehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12857676039536372689noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279669963757550971.post-15439027813356399042009-10-22T19:27:18.997+01:002009-10-22T19:27:18.997+01:00I saw the same thing today and this one grabbed my...I saw the same thing today and this one grabbed my eye.<br /><br />"State of the City Siege experience: We hear the players concerns about the city siege experience. There's number of concerns about parts of the City Siege ranging from the Stage 1 Lord encounters to players becoming disinterested after the first hour of the City. We're actively investigating solutions to this and want to have more information to you soon. We've also been looking into player concerns about the City Siege VP, and yes, we did find some issues making the transition from Stage 1 to Stage 2 more difficult than it should be. We should have some fixes for these issues very soon."<br /><br />There were always disinteresting, but now your (Mythic) actually listening. Why do they think I bloody hate the things and why we were horrified by the thought that only 2 keeps were required to siege the city. Because there are boring !!!<br /><br />The endgame isn't that exciting. Mythic's best game is within tier 4. I could happily just chop the city's from the map and leave them as just a PvE city.<br /><br />Honestly to make this change (to 2 keeps) before having the rest of the vision in place, was frankly the plan of an imbeciles. If we're not careful the whole of 1.3.2 (great patch) could be remembered for moving to 2 keep city capture and having a revolving door on the cities.<br /><br />Seriously, I just can't see the sense in it. <br /><br />Thank god, I can go lose myself in the lower tiers. There's a whole post in this one section alone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com